Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections after liver transplantation: Prevalence, impact, and risk factors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) are an increasing healthcare problem worldwide. This study analyzes the incidence, burden, and risk factors associated with MDRB infections after liver transplant(ation) (LT). METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients who underwent LT between January 2017 and January 2020. Risk factors related to pre-LT disease, surgical procedure, and postoperative stay were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of MDRB infections within the first 90 days after LT. RESULTS: We included 1,045 LT procedures (960 patients) performed at nine centers across Spain. The mean age of our cohort was 56.8 ± 9.3 years; 75.4% (n = 782) were male. Alcohol-related liver disease was the most prevalent underlying etiology (43.2.%, n = 451). Bacterial infections occurred in 432 patients (41.3%) who presented with a total of 679 episodes of infection (respiratory infections, 19.3%; urinary tract infections, 18.5%; bacteremia, 13.2% and cholangitis 11%, among others). MDRB were isolated in 227 LT cases (21.7%) (348 episodes). Enterococcus faecium (22.1%), Escherichia coli (18.4%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.2%) were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. In multivariate analysis, previous intensive care unit admission (0-3 months before LT), previous MDRB infections (0-3 months before LT), and an increasing number of packed red blood cell units transfused during surgery were identified as independent predictors of MDRB infections. Mortality at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days was significantly higher in patients with MDRB isolates. CONCLUSION: MDRB infections are highly prevalent after LT and have a significant impact on prognosis. Enterococcus faecium is the most frequently isolated multi-resistant microorganism. New pharmacological and surveillance strategies aimed at preventing MDRB infections after LT should be considered for patients with risk factors. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections have a deep impact on morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Strategies aimed at improving prophylaxis, early identification, and empirical treatment are paramount. Our study unveiled the prevalence and main risk factors associated with these infections, and demonstrated that gram-positive bacteria, particularly Enterococcus faecium, are frequent in this clinical scenario. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of prophylactic and empirical antibiotic treatment protocols after liver transplantation.

Effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplant recipients: The PRETHI study.

Data comparing long-term effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplantation are scarce. We compared the effectiveness, pharmacokinetic profile, and safety of LCPT (Envarsus) and PR-Tac (Advagraf) for up to 12 months post-transplant. Adult de novo liver transplant recipients who started IR-Tac (Prograf) and were converted to LCPT or PR-Tac 3-5 days post-transplant were included. Data from 163 patients were analyzed, 87 treated with LCPT and 76 with PR-Tac. The incidence of treatment failure was 30.5% in the LCPT group versus 23.0% in the PR-Tac group (p = .291). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reported in 26.8% of patients in the LCPT group and 17.6% in the PR-Tac group (p = .166). Graft loss was experienced in one patient (1.2%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p = .346). Death was registered in three patients (3.7%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p > .999). Patients in the LCPT group showed 45.7% higher relative bioavailability (Cmin /total daily dose [TDD]; p < .01) with similar Cmin and 33.3% lower TDD versus PR-Tac (p < .01). The evolution of renal function, safety profile, and the incidence of post-transplant renal failure, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were similar in patients treated with LCPT and PR-Tac. In de novo liver transplant patients, LCPT and PR-Tac showed comparable effectiveness with higher relative bioavailability, similar Cmin and lower TDD in the LCPT group. Renal function, safety, and post-transplant complications were comparable in LCPT and PR-Tac groups.

Self-expandable metal stent fixation with a temporary Overstitch Apollo® suture as a rescue therapy for a reluctant tuberculous esophageal-mediastinal fistula.

We present the case of a 79 y.o. male diagnosed with tuberculosis and mediastinal lymphadenopathy fistulizing in the esophageal lumen. Despite a number of treatments, including over-the scope (OVESCO) clip, the patient had intolerance for oral intake and repeated infections.

COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients in Spain Throughout 2020: Catching the Wave?

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed differences in clinical presentation and outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across different pandemic waves. METHODS: In this multicenter, nationwide, prospective study, we compared demographics and clinical features, therapeutic management, and outcomes in SOT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Spain before (first wave) or after (second wave) 13 July 2020. RESULTS: Of 1634 SOT recipients, 690 (42.2%) and 944 (57.8%) were diagnosed during the first and second periods, respectively. Compared with the first wave, recipients in the second were younger (median: 63 y [interquartile range, IQR: 53-71] versus 59 y [IQR: 49-68]; P < 0.001) and less likely to receive anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 drugs (81.8% versus 8.1%; P < 0.001), with no differences in immunomodulatory therapies (46.8% versus 47.0%; P = 0.931). Adjustment of immunosuppression was less common during the second period (76.4% versus 53.6%; P < 0.001). Hospital admission (86.7% versus 58.1%; P < 0.001), occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (34.1% versus 21.0%; P < 0.001), and case-fatality rate (25.8% versus 16.7%; P < 0.001) were lower in the second period. In multivariate analysis, acquiring COVID-19 during the first wave was associated with an increased risk of death (OR: 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.93; P = 0.005), although this impact was lost in the subgroup of patients requiring hospital (OR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29; P = 0.873) or intensive care unit admission (OR: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.18; P = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: We observed meaningful changes in demographics, therapeutic approaches, level of care, and outcomes between the first and second pandemic waves. However, outcomes have not improved in the more severe cases of posttransplant COVID-19.

Epidemiological pattern, incidence, and outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients are a matter of debate. METHODS: We performed a prospective nationwide study including a consecutive cohort of liver transplant patients with COVID-19 recruited during the Spanish outbreak from 28 February to 7 April, 2020. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care, and/or death. Age- and gender-standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR and SMR) were calculated using data from the Ministry of Health and the Spanish liver transplant registry. Independent predictors of severe COVID-19 among hospitalised patients were analysed using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 111 liver transplant patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (SIR = 191.2 [95% CI 190.3-192.2]). The epidemiological curve and geographic distribution overlapped widely between the liver transplant and general populations. After a median follow-up of 23 days, 96 patients (86.5%) were admitted to hospital and 22 patients (19.8%) required respiratory support. A total of 12 patients were admitted to the ICU (10.8%). The mortality rate was 18%, which was lower than in the matched general population (SMR = 95.5 [95% CI 94.2-96.8]). Overall, 35 patients (31.5%) met criteria of severe COVID-19. Baseline immunosuppression containing mycophenolate was an independent predictor of severe COVID-19 (relative risk = 3.94; 95% CI 1.59-9.74; p = 0.003), particularly at doses higher than 1,000 mg/day (p = 0.003). This deleterious effect was not observed with calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus and complete immunosuppression withdrawal showed no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Being chronically immunosuppressed, liver transplant patients have an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 but their mortality rates are lower than the matched general population. Upon hospital admission, mycophenolate dose reduction or withdrawal could help in preventing severe COVID-19. However, complete immunosuppression withdrawal should be discouraged. LAY SUMMARY: In liver transplant patients, chronic immunosuppression increases the risk of acquiring COVID-19 but it could reduce disease severity. Complete immunosuppression withdrawal may not be justified. However, mycophenolate withdrawal or temporary conversion to calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus until disease resolution could be beneficial in hospitalised patients.

COVID-19 in transplant recipients: The Spanish experience.

We report the nationwide experience with solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Spain until 13 July 2020. We compiled information for 778 (423 kidney, 113 HSCT, 110 liver, 69 heart, 54 lung, 8 pancreas, 1 multivisceral) recipients. Median age at diagnosis was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-70), and 66% were male. The incidence of COVID-19 in SOT recipients was two-fold higher compared to the Spanish general population. The median interval from transplantation was 59 months (IQR: 18-131). Infection was hospital-acquired in 13% of cases. No donor-derived COVID-19 was suspected. Most patients (89%) were admitted to the hospital. Therapies included hydroxychloroquine (84%), azithromycin (53%), protease inhibitors (37%), and interferon-ß (5%), whereas immunomodulation was based on corticosteroids (41%) and tocilizumab (21%). Adjustment of immunosuppression was performed in 85% of patients. At the time of analysis, complete follow-up was available from 652 patients. Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in 35% of patients. Ultimately, 174 (27%) patients died. In univariate analysis, risk factors for death were lung transplantation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.6), age >60 years (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 2.5-5.5), and hospital-acquired COVID-19 (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.9-4.9).

T2 magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of deep-seated invasive candidiasis in a liver recipient without candidemia.

BACKGROUND: T2 magnetic resonance imaging (T2MR) is a new method for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis, although most studies have analyzed its role in patients with candidemia or not infection. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a patient with arteritis and thrombosis of the hepatic graft resulted from an undocumented fungal infection in the explanted liver.T2MR in serum was a suitable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of the deep-seated invasive candidiasis in the absence of candidemia or the isolation of the yeast in culture. CONCLUSIONS: T2MR allowed the diagnosis of deep-seated invasive candidiasis in an immunodepressed patient without candidemia, even before the onset of symptoms.

T2 magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of deep-seated invasive candidiasis in a liver recipient without candidemia / Resonancia magnética T2 para el diagnóstico de candidiasis invasora profunda en un receptor de hígado sin candidemia

Background: T2 magnetic resonance imaging (T2MR) is a new method for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis, although most studies have analyzed its role in patients with candidemia or not infection. Case report: We present the case of a patient with arteritis and thrombosis of the hepatic graft resulted from an undocumented fungal infection in the explanted liver.T2MR in serum was a suitable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of the deep-seated invasive candidiasis in the absence of candidemia or the isolation of the yeast in culture. Conclusions: T2MR allowed the diagnosis of deep-seated invasive candidiasis in an immunodepressed patient without candidemia, even before the onset of symptoms

Antecedentes: La técnica T2 de visualización en resonancia magnética (T2MR, por su abreviatura en inglés) es un método nuevo de diagnóstico de candidiasis invasora, si bien la mayoría de los estudios la ha validado en casos de candidemia o cuando no hay infección. Caso clínico: Se presenta el caso de una paciente con arteritis y trombosis de la arteria hepática en el injerto secundarias a una infección profunda por Candida en el hígado explantado. La positividad de la técnica T2MR en suero constituyó la única evidencia de infección profunda por Candida en ausencia de candidemia o existencia de la levadura en cultivo. Conclusiones: La técnica T2MR permitió el diagnóstico de una infección profunda por Candida en una paciente inmunodeprimida en una fase muy precoz de la enfermedad

Donor-derived multiorgan transmission of mixed P. malariae and P. ovale infection: Impact of globalization on post-transplant infections.

A 57-year-old man was admitted with fever and thrombocytopenia 1 month after renal transplantation. He had never received a blood transfusion or travelled outside Spain. A peripheral blood smear revealed Plasmodium malariae and P. ovale parasites, diagnosis confirmed later by malaria PCR. The donor, from Equatorial Guinea, had negative thick and thin blood smears and rapid malaria antigen test prior to organ donation. Peripheral blood malaria PCR was not performed during donor screening. The second renal recipient and the liver recipient were evaluated and were found to be asymptomatic. Thick and thin films and rapid malaria diagnostic tests were negative for both patients and blood for malaria PCR was sent to the referral laboratory. The index patient was treated with oral chloroquine diphosphate, with a favorable outcome and was considered cured. Malaria PCR was negative for the other renal recipient and positive for P. malariae and P. ovale curtisi for the liver transplant patient. Both were treated with oral chloroquine and the liver recipient also completed treatment with primaquine phosphate. This reported case of multiorgan transmission of mixed malaria infection highlights the importance of PCR-based tests for Plasmodium in the screening of donors from endemic areas.

Current allocation policy is favorable for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are a growing population of the transplantation waiting list (WL) for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). There is no consensus to prioritize these patients while on the WL. AIMS: To assess whether patients with HCC were more prioritized than non-HCC patients based on their WL survival as primary outcome. METHODS: Restrospective cohort study including patients listed for elective OLT from January 2013 to January 2016. RESULTS: 165 patients with cirrhosis were listed for OLT: 64 in the HCC group (38.78%) and 101 in the non-HCC group (61.22%). Outcomes (HCC vs. non-HCC) were: OLT in 75.51% vs. 64.37%; death or dropout due to worsening in 20.41% vs. 27.59%, and delisting because of improvement in 4.08% vs. 8.05%. HCC patients had a significantly higher WL survival rate (HR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.21-0.96); lower MELD score at transplantation (21 [20-24] vs. 24 [20-30]; p = 0.021); higher delta-MELD - the difference between MELD at transplantation and MELD at listing time - (3 [2-6] vs. 0 [0-5]; p = 0.024) and longer waiting time until OLT (143 [70-233] vs. 67 [21-164] days; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Despite having to wait longer, patients with HCC showed higher WL survival than non-HCC patients.

Safety and anti-HCV effect of prolonged intravenous silibinin in HCV genotype 1 subjects in the immediate liver transplant period.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reinfection of the graft is the rule in patients with HCV cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation, and HCV-RNA reaches pre-transplantation levels within the first month. Short-term intravenous silibinin monotherapy is safe and shows a potent in vivo anti-HCV effect. We aimed at evaluating the safety and antiviral effect of prolonged intravenous silibinin, started immediately before liver transplantation. METHODS: Single centre, prospective, pilot study, to assess the safety and effect on HCV-RNA kinetics during at least 21 days of intravenous silibinin monotherapy (20 mg/kg/day) in 9 consecutive HCV genotype 1 subjects, in comparison to a control, non-treated group of 7 consecutive prior transplanted subjects under the same immunosuppressive regimen (basiliximab, steroids, delayed tacrolimus, micophenolate). RESULTS: Intravenous silibinin led to significant, maintained and progressive HCV-RNA decreases (mean HCV-RNA drop at week 3, -4.1 ± 1.3 log(10)IU/ml), and lack of viral breakthrough during administration. Four patients (44%) reached negative HCV-RNA, maintained during silibinin treatment, vs. none in the control group, but HCV-RNA relapsed in all of them after a median of 21 days (16-28), following silibinin withdrawal. Partial responders to silibinin showed marked decreases in HCV-RNA when compared to controls, but lower than complete responders. There were no clinical adverse effects, and silibinin led to asymptomatic transient hyperbilirubinemia (week 2, 4.2 ± 2.2 vs. 2.5 ± 3.6 mg/dl; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged intravenous silibinin monotherapy was safe in the immediate liver transplantation period, leading to a potent and time dependent antiviral effect and lack of HCV-RNA breakthrough during administration. However, HCV-RNA rebounded after withdrawal, and silibinin monotherapy did not avoid reinfection of the graft.

Severe rhabdomyolysis due to rosuvastatin in a liver transplant subject with human immunodeficiency virus and immunosuppressive therapy-related dyslipidemia.

Statins are relatively safe first-line agents to use in the setting of dyslipidemia associated with immunosuppressive therapy in subjects undergoing liver transplantation, and also in HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia due to antiretroviral drugs, especially ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. Rosuvastatin, a new statin, has demonstrated higher potency than previously released statins and is not extensively metabolized by the liver P450 system; therefore, the probability of deleterious pharmacokinetic interactions with commonly used immunosuppressants and antiretroviral drugs is reduced. We present the first case of severe rhabdomyolysis in a liver transplant patient receiving rosuvastatin for the treatment of immunosuppressive therapy-related grade IV dyslipidemia, an HIV-infected subject on protease inhibitor-sparing HAART, that resolved after rosuvastatin withdrawal, probably related to interactions between calcineurin inhibitors and hepatic rosuvastatin uptake transporters such as organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs).

Partial splenic embolization and peg-IFN plus RBV in liver transplanted patients with hepatitis C recurrence: safety, efficacy and long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the long-term outcome in liver transplant (LT) subjects undergoing partial splenic embolization (PSE) prior to full dose pegylated interferon/ribavirin (peg-IFN/RBV). METHODS: Retrospective review of eight LT subjects after PSE and antiviral therapy. RESULTS: Baseline platelets and neutrophils were <50 000 cells/mL and <1000 cells/mL in 75% and 50%. Mean splenic infarction volume was 85 +/- 13%. PSE produced major complications in three (37.5%): recurrent sterile netrophilic ascites and renal insufficiency (n = 2), and splenic abscess (n = 1). Full-dose peg-IFN/RBV was started in seven (87.5%), with two early withdrawals (28.6%) despite early virological response (toxicity and infection); both subjects died. Anemia led to RBV dose-adjustment in six (86%), with human recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) use in four (57%). No peg-IFN adjustments or granulocyte-colonies stimulating factor were needed. Two patients reached sustained virological response (SVR) (28.6%). Two non-responders maintained prolonged therapy with biochemical/histological improvement. After a median follow-up of 151 wk, we observed significant improvements in hematological parameters, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, and prothrombin activity. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive PSE after LT produced significant morbidity (37.5%). Peg-IFN/RBV was completed in five out of seven (71%), with SVR in two (28.6%). RBV adjustement due to anemia was high despite EPO use. Only patients able to complete or maintain antiviral therapy survived, with long-term significant benefits in hematological parameters and liver function tests.

Hepatitis B infection of the liver in chronic hepatitis C without detectable hepatitis B virus DNA in serum.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA may persist in the liver in the absence of serum HBV-DNA after a self-limited acute hepatitis B. This may also occur in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection but its prevalence and its impact on liver histology is unknown. HBV-DNA was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by in situ hybridisation in liver biopsies from 98 patients with chronic hepatitis C who were hepatitis B surface antigen negative and serum HBV-DNA negative by PCR. HBV-DNA resulted positive in the liver of 37/98 (37.7%) patients without serum HBV-DNA. To test whether these patients had serum HBV-DNA levels under the detection limit of the PCR assay used in this study (50 copies/ml), PCR products in which HBV-DNA was undetectable after visualization of agarose gels were analysed by dot-blot hybridisation. With this method, HBV-DNA was positive in serum of 12/37 patients with liver HBV-DNA. Thus, 25/98 (25.5%) patients have HBV-DNA detectable only in liver. This was confirmed by in situ hybridisation, the percentage of infected hepatocytes ranging from 0.1% to 12%. In patients in whom the HCV infection was shorter than 20 years, HBV infected patients had higher (P = 0.01) fibrosis score (1.64 +/- 1.21) than HBV negative cases (0.53 +/- 0.66). In conclusion, a significant proportion of patients with chronic HCV infection have HBV-DNA in the liver in the absence of viral DNA in serum. The impact of this finding on liver histology deserves further research.

Occult hepatitis C virus infection in patients in whom the etiology of persistently abnormal results of liver-function tests is unknown.

BACKGROUND: There are patients in whom the etiology of long-standing abnormal results of liver-function tests is unknown (ALF-EU) after exclusion of all known causes of liver diseases. We analyzed the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in liver-biopsy specimens from 100 patients who were negative for anti-HCV antibodies and for serum HCV RNA and who had ALF-EU. METHODS: HCV RNA status was tested by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and by in situ hybridization, in liver and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RESULTS: HCV RNA was detected in liver-biopsy specimens from 57 of 100 patients negative for anti-HCV antibodies and for serum HCV RNA (i.e., who had occult HCV infection). HCV RNA of negative polarity was found in the liver of 48 (84.2%) of these 57 patients with occult HCV infection. Nucleotide-sequence analysis confirmed the specificity of detection of HCV RNA and that patients were infected with the HCV 1b genotype. Of these 57 patients with intrahepatic HCV RNA, 40 (70%) had viral RNA in their PBMCs. With regard to liver histology, patients with occult HCV infection were more likely to have necroinflammatory activity (P=.017) and fibrosis (P=.022) than were patients without intrahepatic HCV RNA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ALF-EU may have intrahepatic HCV RNA in the absence of anti-HCV antibodies and of serum HCV RNA.